Ajit Pawar or Sharad Pawar, who exactly will the NCP party belong to?

Ajit Pawar or Sharad Pawar,

who exactly will the NCP party belong to?

Finally there was a rebellion in the NCP Ajit Pawar completed the swearing in of nine ministers of his faction and two new factions were formed in the politics of the state The people of the state who are used to hearing two factions of Shiv Sena namely Shinde faction and Thackeray faction will now have to listen to Ajit Pawar faction and Sharad Pawar faction.

From here on We are not a group but the entire NCP party. The entire NCP party has decided to support Chief Minister Eknath Shinde's government. It was announced by Ajit Pawar group that we will fight the upcoming elections also in the name and symbol of the NCP party.

Therefore, it is Shinde's group to make a claim against the entire party, to turn the hanging sword of banning MLAs against the group's MLAs, and then to claim in front of the Assembly Speaker and the Election Commission that the majority MLAs are holding MPs with our group Ajit Pawar group will be seen from here on while repeating the script.

However, the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Thackeray Shinde power struggle and the testimony of the strength of the number of MLAs that Ajit Pawar has, Eknath Shinde and Ajit Pawar will not be able to gain control of the NCP as easily.

So let's find out from this blog how the rebellion 2.0 in the state that came up after the split in the state will continue, which party's MLAs between the Sharad Pawar group and the Ajit Pawar group will have the hanging sword of defection ban and how the game is still not over for Sharad Pawar .

So let's start with the defection ban law that has been in constant discussion for the last year and the NCP has a total of 53 MLAs in the assembly And that's why it becomes necessary for a faction breaking out of NCP to have 36 MLAs. If we look at the current situation, it is claimed that Ajit Pawar's group has 30 to 40 MLAs . Sharad Pawar has also said that many MLAs are in contact with me, but he has not given the exact number of his MLAs

In such a case, the most important role will be that of the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly. The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly, Rahul Narvekar, will have to take the first decision on who is the real political party.

After that, the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly will recognize the interest of the group as a political party and then decide which group's MLAs will be disqualified under the defection ban.

Elected on BJP symbol Rahul Narvekar as the Assembly Speaker will recognize Ajit Dada as the official nationalist political party and accordingly the MLAs who went to Ajit Dada will be saved from defection ban even if the number of MLAs is not 36 will be found in the sand

Such predictions are made here but the game is not that simple. Rahul Narvekar will have to follow the decision given by the Supreme Court in the hearing of Shinde and Thackeray group in deciding which is the real political party. The Supreme Court recognized the full right of the assembly speaker to decide which is the real political party in its hearing hall.

The court made it clear that even the Supreme Court cannot interfere in these matters before the Assembly Speaker and before giving a decision. But at the same time, the Supreme Court has also laid down some criteria for the President to decide which political party belongs to which party.

While giving a verdict in this case, while deciding whether Thackeray group or Shinde group, Kota was instructed to take into account what the constitution of Shiv Sena says, at the same time it was instructed to take into account the party organization outside the legislatureEven after giving Rahul Narvekar the question of disqualification of Chief Minister Eknath Shinde's MLAs is still not resolved.

In fact, it is possible for Rahul Narvekar to repeat the decision of the Election Commission to declare the constitution of Shiv Sena illegal only on the number of MLAs, but he has not yet taken such a decision.

Because the decision taken by the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly by excluding the above technical facts can be canceled in the Supreme Court. In the case of NCP, this decision can be even more difficult. The reason is that the NCP's constitution like Shiv Sena's constitution is less likely to be illegal.

At the same time, as in Shiv Sena, the post of Shiv Sena Party Chief was added to the constitution of the party without giving any idea to the Election Commission, the National President post of the Nationalist Party, not the Nationalist Party, has remained since the formation of the party and Sharad Pawar has been the party's National President for 24 years.

And so Assembly Speaker Rahul Narvekar has the opportunity to ignore what is in the constitution in case of Shiv Sena as not in NCP and Sharad Pawar still retains important powers as the National President of the party as per the constitution of the party.

In such a case, the question is which group of NCP is the real political party and then it will not be easy for Rahul Narvekar to decide which party's whip is the real whip and then which group's MLA will be disqualified.

Even if the decision is given against the Sharad Pawar group, there will be enough scope to appeal it in the court, so the revolt should not last a year in this court case, as no defection ban action has been taken against the MLAs of any group of Shiv Sena, there is little chance of doing so against the MLAs of both groups of NCP. But if this conflict goes to the court now, it will also take a year, especially because Sharad Pawar decided the eligibility of the MLAs and requested the same to the Legislative Assembly Speaker as the party president.

Only then will this conflict happen. In short, the same script is more likely to be repeated, only this time Pawar will be aware of what not to do.